“”On July 5, 1884, Dudley, Stephens, and Brooks, “all able-bodied English seamenâ€Â, and an English tee-age boy were cast adrift in a lifeboat following a storm at sea. They had no water with them in the boat, and all they had for sustenance were two one-pound tins of turnips. On July 24, Dudley proposed that one of the four in the lifeboat be sacrificed to save the others. Stephens agreed with Dudley, but Brooks refused to consent, and the boy was never asked for his opinion. On July 25, Dudley killed the boy, and the three men then fed on the boy’s body and blood. Four days later, the men were rescued by a passing vessel. They were taken to England and tried for the murder of the boy. If the men had not fed on the boy’s body, they would probably have died of starvation within the four-day period. The boy, who was in a much weaker condition, would likely have died before the rest.You be the judge, and argue and decide the following issues: (a) According to which school or schools of jurisprudence might the court use to support its point of view? (b) Which school or schools of jurisprudence could the advocates of the law rely on to back their point of view? (articulate a justifiable decision after analyzing the situation from Natural law, Positivism, or Legal Realism) Grading RubricAssigment 1: read the facts of case and comment on the issue(s) in question by applying the logic of jurisprudence: natural law, positivism or legal realism in responding to the issue(s) in question.2 – Students submitted their responses to the issue(s) in question in an analytic understanding with reference to the legal issues by applying the logic of jurisprudence.1 -Students submitted their responses to the issue(s) in question in an analytic understanding with NO reference to the legal issues by applying the logic of jurisprudence. 0 – One sentence responses to the issue(s) in question or NO assignment submitted.has to be one page long double spaced” I CANNOT EXTEND THE DEADLINE I WILL FAIL IF I DONT SUBMIT THIS AT 3PM ON 1/24/12
The work has not been graded but I like the output that was submitted to me. Is it possible for the same prof to do the next assignment I will be submitting? If possible, I will greatly appreciate it.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more