The work has not been graded but I like the output that was submitted to me. Is it possible for the same prof to do the next assignment I will be submitting? If possible, I will greatly appreciate it.
M4 D2: Contract Enforcement – Breaches and Remedies
1. Go to the Notable Court Cases Involving Contracts – webpage: https://www.lectlaw.com/files/lws49.htm
2. Select a case that helps you understand the elements of a contract and the basis for enforcement. – Read it.
3. Locate an article where two parties argued about the enforcement of their contract using similar facts. (hint… use breach of contract and the term that is being evaluated in the case i.e. fraud).
4. Copy the mini-case brief and provide a summary of the case you read and connect it to the chapters under Module 4 and the article you located (include hyperlink to article).
WOOD V. BOYNTON (1885)
Facts: P. owned a rough and uncut stone she did not know the identity of, although she thought it might be a topaz. P. sold said stone to D., who also did not recognize the identity or value of the stone, for $1. Upon finding out that the stone was actually a very valuable diamond, P. tendered the D. $1.10, and demanded return of the stone. D. refused, and so P. brought suit.
Nature of the Risk(s): In the absence of explicit contractual statements otherwise, the seller assumes the risk that he under-charged for an item, and the buyer assumes the risk that he over-paid for an item.
Issue(s): Is the P. entitled to rescind the sale because she was ignorant as to the “hypothetical fair market value” of the stone she sold D.?
Holding(s): “In the absence of fraud or warranty, the [hypothetical] value of the property sold, as compared with the price paid, is no ground for rescission of the sale.”
Reasoning: Neither the P. nor the D. had any knowledge that the stone was a diamond, so there was no fraud. In addition, there was no agreement of warranty, either stated or implied.
Chapter XX of our textbook discussed several of the terms covered in this case: _____, _____ (Miller, pages ____). These terms are defined as ::::::. After reading these chapters and this case, I am able to recognize these similar issues in the facts provided in the article I read about XXXX and XXXX disputing the terms of their contract (citation to article)…..
Timeliness: First post must be submitted by November 20th, First Peer Response by: November 22nd… Courteous replies to classmates: by December 1st. Final posts by December 4th
Need help with Blackboard? If you do, please watch the Blackboard Learn Creating a Discussion Post
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more